Warren: Players like Schultz should have some loyalty

With National Hockey League unrestricted free agency here, it’s time for every hockey fan to become a fantasy general manager, dreaming of putting the perfect puzzle pieces together to build a championship team.

Warren: Players like Schultz should have some loyalty

With National Hockey League unrestricted free agency here, it’s time for every hockey fan to become a fantasy general manager, dreaming of putting the perfect puzzle pieces together to build a championship team.

My fantasy league is a bit different. It’s a world where all young phenoms understand their privileged situation and respect the countless hours that scouts spend in far-flung arenas before the players are honoured with the gift of being drafted into an NHL organization.

Far too often that’s not the case, as in the story of Justin Schultz, who has turned his back on the Anaheim Ducks and suddenly become as popular among NHL general managers as Justin Bieber is among adolescent girls.

The GMs will be tripping over each other in Toronto Wednesday, promising Schultz and his agents the moon — and plenty of ice time — in the first free agency war of the summer.

The Senators are in the game, along with apparent front-runners including Detroit Edmonton, Chicago, Toronto, Chicago and the New York Rangers. And no wonder. It’s as close to a freebie as there is in the NHL. After three seasons as a standout offensive defenceman at the University of Wisconsin, Schultz, who turns 22 next week, is already a polished prospect. As an incoming rookie, he’s a bargain, subject to an entry level contract of $925,000.

Yet at the same time, the background to the whole situation must also seem a tad unsettling to NHL general managers.

Back in 2008, the Ducks took a gamble on the then 6-1, 160-pound Schultz, playing with the Westside Warriors in the British Columbia Junior Hockey League. The Ducks saw past the size deficiency, selecting him 43rd overall in the 2008 entry draft, held here at Scotiabank Place. Interestingly enough, the Senators held the 42nd selection, opting for Patrick Wiercioch, another lanky defenceman from B.C. The Senators are still waiting for Wiercioch to blossom into an everyday NHL defenceman.

That’s the nature of second round selections: In most cases, there’s something missing that prevents them from being first round choices. The science of scouting is anticipating which of those 17-year-olds have the best chance of developing into NHL-calibre players.

The Ducks took that leap, investing in Schultz and allowing him to progress and grow into his body at the NCAA level. They had offered Schultz a chance to sign an NHL deal following the 2010-11 season, only to be told Schultz wanted to return for a third season at Wisconsin. As his 2011-12 university season was winding down, the Ducks again extended an offer, telling him he could step directly into the NHL to close out the past season.

Then, when it came time for Schultz to commit, he opted instead to kiss the organization goodbye and become a free agent.

You know that feeling when a slapshot hits you in the nether regions? That’s akin to the way Ducks management felt about the decision. The Ducks have since warned they could file tampering charges against the NHL team that eventually signs him, but the nasty words can hardly soothe the pain from watching their own prospect skate away for nothing.

Schultz might argue that the Ducks have slipped as an organization since the 2008 draft and the defence corps, which boasted Chris Pronger and Scott Niedermayer during the 2007 Stanley Cup, is a shell of its former shelf. Jake Gardiner, Schultz’s good friend from their days together at Wisconsin, was also traded to Toronto, adding to Schultz’s displeasure.

Still, if those are the arguments, why bother having a draft at all? Why ask NHL teams to invest millions of dollars chasing teenagers around rinks on this continent and overseas, believing their scouts can find the hidden gems better than their rivals?

Why not simply recruit players, using a team’s previous success, the chance of advancing quicker, or the promise of guaranteed ice time, as the tools for signing?

The idea of the draft is to address imbalances, allowing weaker teams to improve faster and allowing smaller-market teams equal access to top players, at least when the players are in the early years of their careers.

Of course, if there’s a loophole, some creative player (or his agent and parents) will eventually find it and take advantage. Blake Wheeler successfully pulled off the same stunt as Schultz four years ago.

Players with enough talent have always been able to manipulate situations. Eric Lindros thumbed his nose at Quebec, forcing the trade mess which landed him in Philadelphia. Bryan Berard didn’t like the situation in the early days of the Senators, prompting the deal which brought Wade Redden to Ottawa. Need we re-visit Alexei Yashin? Last fall, Kyle Turris tried to wait out Phoenix in a contract stalemate, eventually receiving his wish by being traded to the Senators.

The fun and games even happen in the junior ranks, where many of the most talented young midgets claim they’ll go the NCAA route unless they’re selected by a particular team.

The tricks will go on, of course, but that doesn’t make them right.

Ultimately, the team that lands Schultz will revel in the great coup, but the ploy doesn’t look good on either the kid or the NHL.

Twitter.com/Citizenkwarren

Tags: ,

7 Responses to “Warren: Players like Schultz should have some loyalty”

  1. John Newman
    June 27, 2012 at 8:36 am #

    I get that the organization that gets this guy will avoid having to give anything up but what happened to proving yourself in the NHL before making demands? Part of me really hopes he falls flat on his face, it is, after all, a big jump from the NCAA to the NHL, and an ‘offensive dynamo’ in college may end up little more than a depth guy in the pros.

  2. Jake MArtino
    June 27, 2012 at 9:25 am #

    Please, organizations show loyalty??? Organizations care so much and are the definition of loyalty, what a joke. Shultz learned to play to game earlier than most, but I don’t feel sorry for any NHL management, you reep what you sow

  3. lcq go bye bye
    June 27, 2012 at 11:10 am #

    He’ll probably sign with Toronto and hopefully turn out to be a bust. Leaf fans deserve that.

  4. Jean Chrl
    June 27, 2012 at 3:21 pm #

    So, players are supposed to stick with a team that picks them? Why? So the team can keep him if they want or trade him if they want? Anaheim had three years to show Schultz that they were a good fit. It didn’t happen and Schultz is looking around. Wouldn’t you do the same thing? Looking back one can recall countless teams that say they really want a player and soon trade that player. Philly last years is a good example and the player is just supposed to be loyal? Good for Schultz. Maybe this will prompt Anaheim to take a serious look at what makes a top flight organization.Anaheim

  5. Joel
    June 27, 2012 at 3:46 pm #

    What about the player that gives his all and then gets traded? You can’t expect loyalty in the business of sports. Sure it’s nice to see a player stick to his team and take a hometown discount but think of the player being drowned in trade rumors? How does that make him feel? Also, when there is no takers, how can a team look that player in the eye and say they’re loyal and to get out there and win for them.

  6. BenS
    June 27, 2012 at 6:51 pm #

    You can argue against the concept of loyalty in pro sports all you want, and I agree with you. But this is not about loyalty, it’s about circumventing the draft. If a team offers the max rookie deal, a player should not be able to sit out for 3 years (as in this case) and become a free agent. After all, Schultz just got free room & board and a college degree out of this. If he wants to go overseas to the KHL or some other European league, fine. But he shouldn’t be able to become a free agent this easily. I think that a team that offers the rookie max should hold the NHL rights of a holdout player until that player fulfills the 3 year contract. Otherwise, you’re neutering the entire concept of the draft.

  7. Owen Kelly
    June 30, 2012 at 7:48 pm #

    Well,well, well, amazing, you want a player to show all kinds of loyalty while the team is not required to show any. With respect to the draft being meant to make weak teams better,yadda,yadda yadda, give me a break. The draft was created to protect teams from bidding against each other for the services of a talented player. It wasn’t to make weak teams better and has hardly ever done that. All I have to point to is Toronto, Long Island Edmonton, and on and on and on.

    Mr. Warren, how would u like it if you came out of journalism school and some idiot says to you, ” you HAVE to come work for me”! Well, I think you would have a different tune about Mr. Schultz determining that he would like to go where HE would like to go!!!

Leave a Reply

Leave your opinion here. Please be nice. Your Email address will be kept private.