The Ottawa Senators are not a contender (or are they?)

For all the ups and downs the Ottawa Senators have had early this season, it turns out they’re right where they should be as they approach the NHL quarter pole.

For all the ups and downs the Ottawa Senators have already had this NHL season, it turns out they’re right where they should be as they approach the quarter pole.

During the preseason, Senators general manager Bryan Murray predicted his team would be a contender in the Eastern Conference, thus implying they should be in the Stanley Cup conversation.

Most observers disagreed — settling on a 4-8 playoff spot — while a handful of prominent publications (Sports Illustrated and The Hockey News among them) saw Ottawa outside the playoff picture altogether.

So what do we know at this still-early point in the season? One thing is for sure: The Senators are not a Stanley Cup “contender” in the classical sense.

The Philadelphia Flyers? Contender. The Vancouver Canucks? Contender. The Boston Bruins? Contender. The Washington Capitals? Contender. The Pittsburgh Penguins? Contender. Each has its own unique weakness, but there’s no denying they are powerhouses.

Of course, the common thread among those teams is that the Senators have lost to all of them them already this year, with their lone win coming against the Bruins last Saturday.

Who have the Senators beaten? Teams like the Hurricanes, the Islanders, the Leafs, the Thrashers and the Panthers. They’ve also beaten once and lost twice to the Montreal Canadiens, who I’m still convinced will be fighting for their playoff lives in March.

I’m not pointing this out to suggest the Senators belong with those lower-tier teams or take away from those victories. A point is a point. My point is that they’re doing what’s expected of them — they’re average.

They’re knocking off teams below them in the standings and losing to the ones above them. They aren’t stellar at scoring goals (24th) or keeping them out of their own net (19th). Both their power play and penalty kill are respectable, but not spectacular.

And maybe that’s all coach Cory Clouston and general manager Bryan Murray need from them at this point. Sure it would be nice to blow teams away all winter and build some excitement ahead of the playoffs, but it doesn’t really matter as long as the team is included in those playoffs.

As the Philadelphia Flyers — the latest “contender” to curb stomp the Senators — showed by qualifying for the postseason on the final day of the 2009-2010 schedule and cruising all the way to the final, anything can happen come springtime.

So maybe the Senators are a contender after all.

Let us know what you think in the comment box below.

3 Responses to “The Ottawa Senators are not a contender (or are they?)”

  1. RecalSentrant
    November 16, 2010 at 4:36 pm #

    “As the Philadelphia Flyers — the latest “contender” to curb stomp the Senators — showed by qualifying for the postseason on the final day of the 2009-2010 schedule and cruising all the way to the final, anything can happen come springtime.”

    This is a poor comparison.

    The Flyers had internal issues (rumors of partying that got settled down) and so on…they likely would have finished much higher than that otherwise.

    Also, the Flyers have future Hall of Famer Chris Pronger…when he joins a team they get to the finals (generally) and we have the -9 Gonchar, whee…even more maddening is that Pronger and Giguère left Anaheim and Murray is a former GM of theirs, but thought fixing our first ever draft pick mistake wasn’t important, or getting stable goaltending, sigh.

    Either way, I hope that Murray and everyone won’t spin just making the playoffs as some great accomplishment, hoping we “ooooh” and “aaaah” at hard work and so on.

    This team has issues:

    Its captain has been invisible at times of late, especially when the team is down a few goals. Richards led the charge last night, where was Alfredsson? :(

    A lot of 30-somethings on the roster where successful teams are loaded with 20-somethings and a few vets.

    Erratic goaltending

    Defense? Wazzat? No Erik Karlsson, you don’t have to stop that big forward from crashing into Elliott or Leclaire, just keep dipsy-doodling.

    Forwards? Alfredsson looks slow, Spezza is doing ok, but as usual in offensive spurts. Kovalev is playing well. No secondary scoring past that. No youth at forward.

    As I said before, missing the playoffs wouldn’t be bad for this team, it means it can start getting younger and stop lagging 2-4 years behind other teams in the League with its youth movement.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Not All NHL Coaches Appreciate the Transparency of Parity | PuckUpdate :: The Hockey Blog - November 17, 2010

    [...] James Gordon has a similar thought, writing that while the Ottawa Senators aren’t great, they’re average, and average is good enough for the NHL, where good enough is defined as being one of the 53% of all teams to make the playoffs. [...]

  2. Win-loose situation needed | HockeyNewsFeed.com - November 17, 2010

    [...] Win-loose situation necessitatedThe Blackhawks’ Stanley Cup-winning team wasn’t just a thick collection of talent that could overpower opponents. It was an incomparable cast of characters, many of them favorable, forward, assured and effluent and many of them now travelled. So it’s comprehendible why coach Joel Quenneville often refers to his actual locker room as a noiseless one.Read more on Chicago Sun-TimesSenatorsExtra: Ottawa is not a Stanley Cup contender (or is it?)For all the ups and downs the Ottawa Senators have already had this NHL season, it turns out they’re right where they should be as they approach the quarter pole.Read more on Ottawa Citizen [...]

Leave a Reply

Leave your opinion here. Please be nice. Your Email address will be kept private.